Pengaruh Interaksi Petugas Pajak terhadap Kepercayaan dan Kepatuhan Wajib Pajak di Saumlaki
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.57218/jupeis.Vol5.Iss3.3222Keywords:
Interaksi, Kepercayaan, Kepatuhan, Petugas pajak, Wajib pajakAbstract
Penelitian ini bertujuan menganalisis interaksi petugas pajak dan wajib pajak serta pengaruhnya terhadap kepercayaan dan kepatuhan di Saumlaki, Kabupaten Kepulauan Tanimbar. Penelitian menggunakan pendekatan deskriptif kualitatif dengan 7 informan yang terdiri atas tiga kategori, yaitu wajib pajak orang pribadi karyawan (3 orang), wajib pajak pelaku usaha/UMKM (2 orang), dan wajib pajak badan (2 orang), yang dipilih secara purposive sampling berdasarkan kriteria tertentu. Pengumpulan data dilakukan melalui wawancara semi-terstruktur, observasi langsung, dan catatan lapangan, kemudian dianalisis secara tematik melalui tahapan reduksi data, penyajian data, dan penarikan kesimpulan. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa kualitas pelayanan dan komunikasi petugas pajak memengaruhi kenyamanan wajib pajak dalam memenuhi kewajiban perpajakan, tetapi belum mampu meningkatkan kepercayaan terhadap pemerintah yang tetap rendah akibat maraknya pemberitaan korupsi dan penyalahgunaan anggaran negara. Temuan utama mengungkapkan bahwa kepatuhan wajib pajak lebih didominasi oleh enforced compliance yang didorong oleh rasa takut terhadap sanksi dan risiko hukum, dibandingkan voluntary compliance yang bersumber dari kepercayaan sukarela terhadap otoritas pajak. Meskipun demikian, kesadaran wajib pajak akan pentingnya pajak bagi pembangunan negara tetap terjaga. Penelitian ini merekomendasikan peningkatan transparansi penggunaan anggaran negara, penguatan pengawasan terhadap oknum petugas pajak, serta pendampingan intensif penggunaan sistem Coretax bagi wajib pajak.
Downloads
References
Ayoola, T. J., Olaniyi, O. O., Kolawole, P. E., Aregbesola, O. D., & Wright, O. (2023). Tax administration, trust in tax authorities, and personal income tax compliance: Evidence from Nigeria. Public and Municipal Finance, 12(1), 12–21. https://doi.org/10.21511/pmf.12(1).2023.02
Batrancea, L., Nichita, A., Olsen, J., Kogler, C., Kirchler, E., Hoelzl, E., Weiss, A., Torgler, B., Fooken, J., Fuller, J., Schaffner, M., Banuri, S., Hassanein, M., Alarcón-García, G., Aldemir, C., Apostol, O., Bank Weinberg, D., Batrancea, I., Belianin, A., … Zukauskas, S. (2019). Trust and power as determinants of tax compliance across 44 nations. Journal of Economic Psychology, 74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joep.2019.102191
Belahouaoui, R., & Attak, E. H. (2025). Exploring the relationship between taxpayers and tax authorities in the digital era: evidence on tax compliance behavior in emerging economies. International Journal of Law and Management, 67(6), 632–653. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJLMA-02-2024-0064
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Qualitative Research in Psychology Using thematic analysis in psychology Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. http://www.tandfonline.com/action/journalInformation?journalCode=uqrp20%5Cnhttp://www.tandfonline.com/action/journalInformation?journalCode=uqrp20
Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research Design Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches (5th ed.). SAGE Publications, Inc. https://edge.sagepub.com/creswellrd5e
Guest, G., Bunce, A., & Johnson, L. (2006). How Many Interviews Are Enough?: An Experiment with Data Saturation and Variability. Field Methods, 18(1), 59–82. https://doi.org/10.1177/1525822X05279903
Kirchler, E., Hoelzl, E., & Wahl, I. (2008). Enforced versus voluntary tax compliance: The “slippery slope” framework. Journal of Economic Psychology, 29(2), 210–225. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joep.2007.05.004
Martadinata, I. P. H., & Yasa, I. N. P. (2023). The Role of Taxpayer Trust and Awareness on Voluntary Compliance: An Experimental Study. Jurnal Ilmiah Akuntansi, 7(2), 184–199. https://doi.org/10.23887/jia.v7i2.43346
Paleka, H., & Vitezić, V. (2023). Tax Compliance Challenge through Taxpayers’ Typology. Economies, 11(9). https://doi.org/10.3390/economies11090219
Palinkas, L. A., Horwitz, S. M., Green, C. A., Wisdom, J. P., Duan, N., Hoagwood, K., Angeles, L., & Northwest, K. P. (2016). Purposeful sampling for qualitative data collection and analysis in mixed method implementation research. Adm Policy Ment Health, 42(5), 533–544. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10488-013-0528-y.Purposeful
Phillippi, J., & Lauderdale, J. (2017). A Guide to Field Notes for Qualitative Research : Context and Conversation. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732317697102
Sandelowski, M. (1995). Sample size in qualitative research. Research in Nursing & Health, 18(2), 179–183. https://doi.org/10.1002/nur.4770180211
Santoro, F., Masuku, P., & Magongo, T. (2026). Cashless tax systems: voluntary vs. mandated digital payments in Eswatini. International Tax and Public Finance, (171). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10797-026-09982-4
Timothy, J., & Abbas, Y. (2021). Tax morale, perception of justice, trust in public authorities, tax knowledge, and tax compliance: a study of Indonesian SMEs. EJournal of Tax Research, 19(1), 168–184.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 JUPEIS : Jurnal Pendidikan dan Ilmu Sosial

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.




